Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and procedural history of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties' arguments regarding disciplinary process and penalty. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court confirms adequacy of disciplinary authority's reconsidered decision. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
V. KAMESWAR RAO , J. (ORAL)
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:
“i. declare the Findings dated 13.07.2013 (at ANN P 1), impugned final Order dated 31.10.2013 (at ANN P 2), impugned appellate order dated 26.12.2013 (at ANN P-3), impugned order dated 23.01.2015 rejecting Revision Petition (at ANN P-4) and impugned Order dated 17.03.2020 (at ANN P-5) passes by respondent no.2 as unlawful and hence to quash and set aside the same.
ii. direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits including pay and allowances for the period of removal from service till joining the force, seniority, promotions and other all benefits.
iii. any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. The petitioner was recruited on the post constable/GD on 28.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
