Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASMEET SINGH, J
PRATAP CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
MR. MANISH SISODIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. election petition filed under rp act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner argues election was vitiated by violations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. respondent questions maintainability of the petition. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court emphasizes strict adherence to election law. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. court finds petition lacks material facts. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. allegations must link directly to election result. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. non-disclosure of fir does not imply ground for voiding election. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. election petition is dismissed for lack of cause. (Para 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present election petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 33A , 80, 81, 125, 126 read with Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (“the RP Act”), against the election of respondent from AC-57, Patparganj, National Capital Territory of Delhi, in the Legislative Assembly Elections held in February 2020.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. The Election Commission of India issued the notification dated 06.01.2020 for holding the General E
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
