SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GM MODULAR PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MUMTAZ AHMED & ANR. – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 17.01.2026 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 176/2024 & I.A. 39130/2024 GM MODULAR PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner versus MUMTAZ AHMED & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Deepak Srivastava, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Ms. Shruti Manchanda and Ms. Deasha Mehta, Advocates.

For the Respondents : Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Mayank S. and Mr. Om Rai, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J

1. The present Rectification Petition has been filed under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) seeking rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by cancellation / removal of the Trade Mark ‘ ’

registered under Trade Mark Application No. 1978669 in Class 11 (“Impugned Trade Mark”) in favour of Respondent No. 1.

PROCEEDURAL BACKGROUND:

2. The Notice in the present Petition was issued vide Order dated 11.09.2024 and the Respondents were given a time of four weeks to file their respective replies to the present Petition. Vide Order dated 06.12.2024, it was recorded that the Petitioner filed an Affida

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top