SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANGITA RAI – Appellant
Versus
NEW DELHI BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS. – Respondent


DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL)

1. This intra-court appeal seeks exception to an order dated 30.10.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge whereby, W.P.(C) 3331/2023 instituted by the appellant has been dismissed.

2. The appellant is an Advocate, enrolled with the Bar Council in the year 2000 vide Enrolment No. D/53-E/2000. As per the assertions made by the appellant, she has been a regular practitioner as an Advocate since the year 2000 and has represented Government agencies and certain autonomous bodies and has also been on the Senior Panel of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, since the year 2011 and also on the Senior Panel of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, Delhi Jal Board, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and other such bodies or authorities.

3. The appellant instituted the aforesaid writ petition with the following prayers:

“A. Pass Writ or directions in the nature of mandamus or other suitable writ or order or direction thereby directing the Respondents to remove their lock and immediately hand over the possession of the Chamber no. 279A, Patiala House Courts to the Petitioner and allow her to use the same without any hindrance and difficulty.

B. Issue a W

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top