Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Madhu Jain, JJ
Narender Singh – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to fir and charges against appellants. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence presented and witnesses examined. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. trial court findings on witness reliability. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. arguments by appellants on lack of intent. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. testimonies of key witnesses regarding events. (Para 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. court's assessment of provocation and intent. (Para 20 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. legal reasoning regarding culpability and appropriate charges. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. final verdict and sentencing of the appellants. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellants - Narender Singh i.e., Appellant No.1 and Balender Singh i.e., Appellant No.2 under Section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (hereinafter, ‘ BNSS ’) challenging final judgement and order of conviction dated 2nd September, 2025 (hereinafter, ‘impugned judgment’) and order on sentence dated 16th September, 2025 passed by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge-04, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi inSessions Case No. 44867/2015
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
