Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
RAGHUABIR SARAN – Appellant
Versus
JAI BHAGWAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks eviction under bona fide requirement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tenants contest landlord's bona fide claim. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal standing questioned due to landlord's death. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments on family dependency and cordiality. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. subsequent events affect litigation context. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. rc's findings on landlord's rights assessed. (Para 19 , 21) |
| 7. court critiques rc's assumptions and reasoning. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. court affirms jurisdiction despite tenant's time discrepancies. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 9. eviction order issued; case concluded. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner/ landlord, Hereinafter ‘landlord filed an Eviction Petition being E. No.77513/2016 entitled ‘Raghubir Saran vs. Jai Bhagwan & Anr.’ under Section 14 (1)(e) read with Section 25 (B) of the Delhi Rent Control Act , 1958, Hereinafter ‘DRC Act against the respondents/ tenants, Hereinafter ‘tenants seeking eviction of Shop No.502, Main Bazar, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-110007, Hereinafter ‘subject premises, before the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, Hereinafter ‘learned RC
2. Briefly put, as per landlord
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
