NATASHA OBEROI vs RAJARAMAN SHANKAR - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 228

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 228

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
NATASHA OBEROI – Appellant
Versus
RAJARAMAN SHANKAR – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Ms. Amita Gupta Katragadda, Ms. Surabhi Khattar, Ms. Ambika Mathur, Ms. Niharika Chhabra, Mr. Shivansh Vishwakarma
For the Respondents: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Mr. Ankur Sood, Mr. Dhaman Trivedi, Mr. Prajwal Suman, Ms. Romila Mandal, Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Aakash Bajaj, Mr. Shivank Diddi, Ms. Prerona Banerjee, Ms. Sania Abbasi, Mr. Priyansh Sharma, Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Aman Gupta, Mr. Anup Kashyap, Mr. Divyam Kandhari, Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Aadil Singh Boparai, Ms. Shivambika Sinha, Ms. Nimita Kaul, Ms. Sajal Jain, Mr. Vaibhav Mendiratta

JUDGMENT

INDEX I. FACTUAL MATRIX ......................................................................................... 3 II. SUBMISSIONS MADE ON BEHALF OF THE PARTIES ......................... 6 III. ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 8 A. THE CONDITION OF SIGNING THE DOCUMENT CONTAINING THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT ......................................................................... 9 B. THE REQUIREMENT OF BEING PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT ................................................................................................... 15 C. THE INTENT TO ARBITRATE .................................................................. 23 IV. ORDER ........................................................................................................... 36 The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ―Arbitration Act‖/―the Act‖ seeking an interim stay on the operation of a resolution dated 06.06.2025, passed by the board of directors of respondent no. 5, whereby, one Mr. Tejaswi Dixit has been granted the authority, inter alia,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 228

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JNATASHA OBEROI – AppellantVersusRAJARAMAN SHANKAR – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
NATASHA OBEROI – Appellant
Versus
RAJARAMAN SHANKAR – Respondent