Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
MCD – Appellant
Versus
HARDAYAL SINGH MEENA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion procedures and seniority lists (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. challenge to promotion's effective date (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against tribunal's decision (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. respondents' defense of promotion validity (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court's findings on legality of promotions (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. concluding order and dismissal of petition (Para 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
MADHU JAIN J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 14.01.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. 3577/2023, titled as Hardayal Singh Meena & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the above mentioned O.A. filed by the respondents herein and held as under:
“25. The applicants case is on a better footing. They had been promoted in compliance of the Hon'ble High court of Delhi orders in 2007 and had been promoted further on 2020 and 2022. As such they have served on the promotional post for more than 15 years and are settled in hig
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
