Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Mehta, Vinod Kumar, JJ
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA NHAI – Appellant
Versus
ROADWAY SOLUTIONS INDIA INFRA LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute arises from nhai's appeal under arbitration act. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented about contract termination and obligations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 22) |
| 3. court's analysis on sufficiency of nhai's reasons for action. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 38) |
| 4. nhai restrained from encashing guarantees until arbitration decision. (Para 39) |
| 5. conclusion on appeal outcomes and observations by the court. (Para 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
REPORTABLE DINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral CM APPL. 1612/2026 (Exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
FAO(OS) (COMM) 4/2026, CM APPL. 1611/2026 (Stay), CM APPL.
1613/2026 (Permission to file lengthy list of dates)
3. Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India appearing for the appellant submitted that package No. VIII qua which the dispute has arisen is a part of Delhi-Mumbai National Expressway which is not only an ambitious project of the National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as „NHAI‟) but will also serve the purpose of infrastructure development and increasing the connectivity between the tw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
