SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 285

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KALYAN DASS THROUGH LR'S – Appellant
Versus
PRAVEEN CHAWLA – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

MINI PUSHKARNA, J.

Introduction:

1. The Regular First Appeals being RFA 474/2013 and RFA 475/2013 are filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking to set aside the common judgment and decree dated 16th May, 2023 (“impugned judgment”), passed by the District and Sessions Judge (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No. 355/10 and Counter Claim No. 633/10, titled as ―Sh. Parveen Chawla Versus Sh. Kalyan Dass‖ as regards the findings on ownership, possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction.

2. ⁠The suit was filed by the plaintiff/respondent for possession, mesne profits/damages, and permanent injunction with respect to the property bearing no. B-25A, Vijay Nagar, Delhi – 110009 (“suit property”). The Trial Court decreed the suit by granting possession of the suit property in favor of the plaintiff/respondent, on the ground that the plaintiff/respondent is the owner of the suit property. The Trial Court dismissed the Counter Claim of the defendant/appellant, wherein, the appellant sought for declaration of ownership in relation to the portion of property in possession of the appellant. However, the Trial Court granted 90 days’ time to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top