IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KALYAN DASS THROUGH LR'S – Appellant
Versus
PRAVEEN CHAWLA – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
Introduction:
1. The Regular First Appeals being RFA 474/2013 and RFA 475/2013 are filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking to set aside the common judgment and decree dated 16th May, 2023 (“impugned judgment”), passed by the District and Sessions Judge (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No. 355/10 and Counter Claim No. 633/10, titled as ―Sh. Parveen Chawla Versus Sh. Kalyan Dass‖ as regards the findings on ownership, possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction.
2. The suit was filed by the plaintiff/respondent for possession, mesne profits/damages, and permanent injunction with respect to the property bearing no. B-25A, Vijay Nagar, Delhi – 110009 (“suit property”). The Trial Court decreed the suit by granting possession of the suit property in favor of the plaintiff/respondent, on the ground that the plaintiff/respondent is the owner of the suit property. The Trial Court dismissed the Counter Claim of the defendant/appellant, wherein, the appellant sought for declaration of ownership in relation to the portion of property in possession of the appellant. However, the Trial Court granted 90 days’ time to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.