$~9

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: 12^th January, 2026

Uploaded on: 15^th January, 2026

+ CRL.A. 251/2025

PARVEEN TANEJA .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Adv. for Mr.

Sudarshan Rajan, Adv. (DHLSC)

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with

Ms. Divya Yadav & Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advs. along with Insp. Amit Kumar,

PS Badarpur

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

CRL.M.(BAIL) 451/2025 (For Suspension of Sentence) in CRL.A.

251/2025

2. On the previous date of hearing i.e., 8th October, 2025 the Court was

considering the present application and had directed as under:

“2. In view of the directions passed by the Supreme Court in the case of “Kaushal Singh vs. The State of Rajasthan” 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1473, decided on 18.07.2025, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to place an affidavit on record, thereby stating about the past involvement of the appellant in criminal case(s), if any, registered against him, containing all the

particulars of the said case(s).

3. Let the affidavit be placed on record, within a period

of two weeks, w