Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ
Vedpal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and departmental disciplinary proceedings overview. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding procedural fairness and proportionality of punishment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. scope of remand regarding penalty and sufficiency of reasoned orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. limited judicial review of disciplinary enquires and penalty proportionality. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final order dismissing the writ petition. (Para 13) |
V. KAMESWAR RAO , J. (ORAL)
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:
“i. declare the findings dated 01.12.2013 (at ANN P-1), impugned final Order dated 06.01.2014 (at ANN P-2), impugned appellate Order dated 17.04.2014 (at ANN P-3), impugned order dated 04.03.2015 rejecting Revision Petition (at ANN P-4) and impugned Order dated 18.03.2020 (at ANN P-5) passed by respondent no. 2, as unlawful and hence to quash and set aside the same.
ii. direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits including pay and allowances for the period of removal from service till joining the force, seniority, promotions and other all benefits.
iii. any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
