SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVEEN KUMAR & ANR. VS. SANJEEV NARULA & ANR.


$~41

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 454/2025

SHAWNTEL CONSULTANCY SERVICES .....Plaintiff

Through: Mr. Deepak K. Sharma, Mr. Neeraj

Kumar, Mr. Ashish Sharma and Mr.

Himanshu, Advs.

versus

NETSYS NETWORK PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 15.01.2026

I.A. 1047/2026 (under Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff)

1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking direction to the Registry to adjust the court fee of Rs.2,10,000/- which was

filed bythe plaintiff alongwith the plaint of the present suit.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff invites attention of the Court to order dated 26.11.2025 wherebythe plaint in present suit was returned to the plaintiff for presentation before proper court having

competent jurisdiction.

3. He submits that the said order was necessitated for the reason that the present suit was filed as a summary suit, whereas, the same ought to have

been filed as a commercial suit.

4. He submits that after the return of plaint, the plaintiff has filed

commercial suit vide diary no.9378498/2025, however, the Registry has raised an objection with regard to the court fee bein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top