IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVEEN KUMAR & ANR. VS. SANJEEV NARULA & ANR.
$~41
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 454/2025
SHAWNTEL CONSULTANCY SERVICES .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Deepak K. Sharma, Mr. Neeraj
Kumar, Mr. Ashish Sharma and Mr.
Himanshu, Advs.
versus
NETSYS NETWORK PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 15.01.2026
I.A. 1047/2026 (under Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff)
1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking direction to the Registry to adjust the court fee of Rs.2,10,000/- which was
filed bythe plaintiff alongwith the plaint of the present suit.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff invites attention of the Court to order dated 26.11.2025 wherebythe plaint in present suit was returned to the plaintiff for presentation before proper court having
competent jurisdiction.
3. He submits that the said order was necessitated for the reason that the present suit was filed as a summary suit, whereas, the same ought to have
been filed as a commercial suit.
4. He submits that after the return of plaint, the plaintiff has filed
commercial suit vide diary no.9378498/2025, however, the Registry has raised an objection with regard to the court fee bein
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.