$~16

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 1177/2012 & CRL.M.A. 37676/2025

AMAN CONSULTANTS PVT LTD .....Appellant

Through: Mr.Purvesh Buttan and Ms.Nishita

Gupta, Advocates.

versus

A R ENTERPRISES & ANR .....Respondents

Through: Mr.Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for

State for R-1.

Mr.Arjun Singh, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

O R D E R

% 15.01.2026

CRL.M.A. 37676/2025 (for transfer of the appeal to trial court)

1. Hybrid Mode.

2. Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of arguing Counsel states that he has instructions to submit that the respondent has “No

objection” to the present application.

3. It is submitted by learned APP for the State that state being performa party being respondent no.1, does not have any objection to the present

application.

4. The present application has its origin in the amendments carried out in the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) in the year 2009. More particularly with respect to the definition of victim which was added under Section 2(wa) and Proviso added to Section 372 Cr.P.C giving certain rights to the

victims / complainant.

5. The Proviso added to Section 372 Cr.P.C provided that complainant / victim can prefer an