SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 630

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ITC INFOTECH INDIA LTD VS. MOHD AZAM


$~12

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ C.R.P. 163/2018

POONAM VERMA .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Vishwendra Singh, Ms. Shivali,

Ms. Ekta Tomar & Mr, A S Verma,

Advs. versus

YASH PRAKASH SHARMA .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Iqbal Singh & Mr. Gursimar

Singh, Advs

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 13.01.2026

1. Mr. Vishwendra Singh has addressed some opening arguments on

behalf of petitioner.

2. Basic facts of the matter are that, a suit was filed bearing No.582/2014 by the respondent/plaintiff before District Court in which leave to defend application was filed by petitioner/defendant. The leave to defend application was filed, along with an application seeking

condonation of delay of 19 days which was rejected.

3. Petitioner herein filed CM(M) No.733/2017 before this Court and by order dated 19th July 2017, same was withdrawn and liberty was granted to take appropriate remedy. This was in context that since the suit under Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) had been decreed by the time CM(M) No.733/2017 was taken up on 19th July 2027, this Court noted that the remedy available to petitioner would be to prefer an appeal or proceedings under Order XXXVII Rul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top