SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 643

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
UNION OF INDIA VS. SITAWANTI & ORS


$~33

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, Mr. Ritank

Kumar, Mr. Anil Pandey, Advs.

versus

NARENDER KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr.

Harshpreet Singh Chadha, Mr.

Hridyesh Khanna, Advs. for DDA

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R

13.01.2026

CM APPL. 1310/2026 (Seeking extension of time to make up deficiency

in court fee)

1. The present Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant/Applicant

seeking extension of time to make up the deficiency in court fees.

2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the Application is allowed and the Appellant is granted four (4) weeks’ time to make good the deficiency

in court fees.

3. The Application duly stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 1309/2026 (Condonation of Delay of 79 days)

4. The present Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant/Applicant seeking condonation of delay of 79 days in filing the

Appeal.

5. The delay is duly condoned.

6. The Application stands disposed of.

7. The present Appeal is filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to set aside the Impugned Judgment and Order dated 07th July, 2025, passed by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top