$~22

Through: Mr. Hemant Pathak (through

VC)Advs.

Appellant in person.

versus

CBI .....Respondent

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

O R D E R

% 13.01.2026

1. This hearing is done through hybrid mode.

2. The proxy counsel has appeared through VC stating that arguing counsel would not be in a position to argue the matter today. None is there on behalf of the CBI. It is further informed that written submissions have

been filed by both the parties.

Through: None.

versus C.B.N. .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

O R D E R

% 13.01.2026

1. This hearing is done through hybrid mode.

2. Notices to the Appellant as well as to the surety and the erstwhile counsel.

Through: Mr. ML Yadav, Mr. Prashant, Ms.

Madhuriam, Advs.

versus STATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State with ASI Om Prakash, PS Sarai Rohilla.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

O R D E R

% 13.01.2026

1. This hearing is done through hybrid mode.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant informs that a connected matter CRL.A. 699/2004 is scheduled to come up for hearing on

23.01.2026 and seeks that this also be heard together in said appeal.

3. In case the Trial Court Record is not there parties may collect it from the Registry so as to enable them to argue the matter.

4. List on 23.01.2026 along with connected matter CRL.A. 699/2004.