Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Madhu Jain, JJ
Angel Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of interim bail applications. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial assessment of repeated bail extension requests despite earlier undertakings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. order granting limited extension subject to final surrender. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CRL.M. (BAIL) 61/2026
2. This is an application filed by the Appellant seeking extension of interim bail granted vide order dated 14th November, 2025, which was further extended on 11th December, 2025 and then again on 26th December, 2025.
3. In accordance with the order dated 26th December 2025, the Appellant was to surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent yesterday i.e., on 11th January, 2026. However, an application has now been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking further extension of the bail. The order dated 26th December, 2025 is relevant and is extracted below:
“3. The present application has been filed seeking extension of interim suspension.
4. Ms. Joshini Tuli, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant submits that the appellant/applicant was granted interim suspension of sentence and resultant bail for a period of four wee
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
