Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Madhu Jain, JJ
J S Ahlawat – Appellant
Versus
Government Nct Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition, underlying dispute regarding parking fees, and the status of prior arbitration proceedings. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's directives restricting coercive recovery of disputed parking charges pending the outcome of the society's appeal. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. The present petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the demand raised by the Respondent No. 4 - Ashoka Enclave CGHS Ltd. (hereinafter “Society”) in respect of an additional car parking. The reliefs sought in the present petition are as under:
“A. Issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the illegal demand for additional car parking by Respondent No. 4 society;
B. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 (DDA) to provide, forthwith, a definitive and public clarification regarding ownership, use, lease or sale rights of common areas of group housing societies under its jurisdiction;
C. Direct DDA to initiate disciplinary and legal action against its officers for failing to act on repeated statutory violations, despite show-cause notices, CPGR+AMS complaints and vigilance alerts;
D. Direct the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and DDA to investiga
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
