$~1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ C. RULE 1/2026

BANK OF INDIA .....Plaintiff

Through:

versus

FIRESTAR DIAMOND FZE AND ORS .....Defendants

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 12.01.2026

1. This matter has been listed before this Bench consequent to a letter of request received by the Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs from the Senior Master of the King’s Bench Division, UK, in connection with a litigation between Bank of India and (i) Firestar Diamond FZE, (ii) Firestar International Private

Limited and (iii) Mr. Nirav Deepak Modi.

2. The letter states that the evidence of a witness who is located within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court is required to be

recorded and seeks the assistance of this Court in that regard.

3. We deem it appropriate to reproduce the letter in extenso thus

F.No.J-21011(705)2025-Judl.

Government of India

MinistryoflawandJustice

Department ofLegal Affairs

(Judicial Section)

Shastri Bhawan,New Delhi DatedDecember,2025 To, TheRegistrar, Hon'bleDelhi HighCourt, SherShahRoad,near IndiaGate NewDelhi-110503, India.

Sub: Letter of request from the Senior Master of the King's Bench Division of the Supreme Court of England and Wales in according to the Hague Convention dated 18th March, 1970 on the taking of evidence abroadinCivil orcommercial matter.

Sir, Please refer to the Letter of request for International Judicial Assistant received from the Senior Master of the King's Bench Division of the Supreme Court of England and Wales Copy enclosed), whereby it has been requested to allow and facilitate the taking of Testimony/evidence from the witness: Mr. Animesh Barua of Bank of India, Field General Manager Office, H-2, MiddleCircle,Connaught Circus, NewDelhi, India.

2. Hence, it is requested for kind consideration to issue a Commission under Order XXVI, Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 for recording the statement etc. of the subject party and send a report of the same to the undersigned for onward transmissiontotheBritish High Commission,NewDelhi Encls: as above Yours Sincerely Sd/-

(Dr.KrishnaMohanArya)

DeputyLegal Adviser

4. The provisions in the CPC which cater to such an eventuality are Rules 19 and 20 of Order XXVI. However, Rule 20 of Order XXVI envisages the High Court acting only upon application by one of the parties to the proceeding before the Foreign Court, or upon an application by a Law Officer of the State Government acting under instructions from the State Government.

5. Though the government is not a party in the lis before the foreign Court, we have requested for the assistance of the learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr. Chetan Sharma, who has graciously appeared along with Mr. Amit Tiwari, learned CGSC.

6. Clearly, it would be necessary to implead the parties in the lis before the King’s Bench and issue notice to them before proceeding further.

7. Accordingly, I deem it appropriate to have the same sequence of parties in this litigation as in the proceedings abroad. The Bank of India would, therefore, be reflected as the plaintiff and (i) Firestar Diamond FZE, (ii) Firestar International Private Limited and (iii)

Nirav Deepak Modi, as the defendants.

8. It is made clear that the parties are being thus impleaded only for the sake of convenience, and it is not as though the lis is pending before this Court.

9. Let emergent notice be issued by all modes including e-mail at the e-mail IDs of parties/their legal representatives as reflected in the aforesaid extracted communication from the King’s Bench, returnable on 15 January 2026.

10. Mr. Nirav Deepak Modi has been shown as a litigant in prison presently lodged at HMP Thameside, Griffin Manorway, Thameside, London, SE28 OFJ.

11. Notice would therefore have to issue to Mr. Nirav Deepak Modi through the Consulate General in the UK.

12. Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned ASG, is requested to ensure that the notice is duly issued to Mr. Nirav Deepak Modi.

13. Re-notify on 15 January 2026.

14. The Registry is