Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J
Havells India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shenzhen Reolink Technology Co Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. exemption from mediation in urgent commercial litigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. procedures for filing documents and service-related applications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. case registration, summons issuance, and deadlines for pleading. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. process for ad-interim injunction applications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
O R D E R
I.A. 602/2026 (Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
I.A. 603/2026 (u/S 12A Commercial Courts Act, 2015 r/w Section 151 CPC)
3. This application is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking exemption from Pre-Institution Mediation.
4. Having regard to the facts of the present case wherein urgent relief is prayed for and in light of the judgment of Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi , (2024) 5 SCC 815, as also Division Bench of this Court in Chandra Kishore Chaurasia v. RA Perfumery Works Private Ltd. , 2022 SCC OnLine Del 3529, exemption is granted to the Plaintiff from Pre-Institution Mediation.
5. Application is allowed and disposed of.
I.A. 604/2026 (u/O XI Rule 1(4) r/w Section 151 CPC)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
