SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 678

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJESH BORKAR & ANR. VS. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS.


$~35

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11104/2020

ASHOK SAWARIA .....Petitioner

Through: Appearance not given

versus

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

.....Respondents

Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel

for MCD with Mr. Parvin Bansal,

Advocate.

Mr. Murari Kumar, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate for R-

3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 12.01.2026

1. This writ petition assails the appointment of Respondent No. 3 to the post of Assistant Education Officer (General) and her continued employment with Respondent No. 1 under the Other Backward Classes1 quota, on the basis of her OBC certificate. Pertinently, the Petitioner is neither an employee of Respondent No. 1/North Delhi Municipal Corporation, nor a person entitled to appointment to the post of Assistant Education Officer (General). Nonetheless, the Petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court seeking a declaration that the appointment of

Respondent No. 3 is illegal.

1 “OBC”

2. The factual matrix relevant to the adjudication of this case is as follows:

2.1. Respondent No. 1 issued an advertisement for the post of Assistant Education Officer (Gen), the selection to whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top