Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandrashekharan Sudha, J
Islamuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the application for suspension of sentence. (Para 1) |
| 2. evaluation of evidence and prima facie case for bail. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. conditions imposed for granting suspension of sentence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
CRL.M.(BAIL) 2356/2025
1. The present application under Sections 430 and 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( Section 389 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) has been filed seeking suspension of sentence awarded to the applicant/accused in Sessions Case No. 261 of 2018 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court), South District, Saket Courts, Delhi. The applicant/accused has been found guilty of the offences punishable under Section 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 5 and 6 of the PoCSO Act. Vide the impugned order on sentence dated 26.08.2023, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 14 years along with payment of fine of ₹5,000/-.
2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/accused draws my attention to the testimony of PW2 as well as PW3, the parents of the victim, who in the chief-in-examination as we
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
