$~41

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAC.APP. 21/2026

SUBHAM .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Som Nath Prashar & Mr. Ritik

Singh, Advs.

versus

RAJEEV KUMAR TYAGI & ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Adv. for R-3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 12.01.2026

CM APPL. 1729/2026 (delay

1. This application seeks condonation of delay of 255 days in filing the

appeal.

2. Issue notice.

3. Counsel for respondent no.3 accepts notice who shall file response

before the next date of hearing, with copy to the opposite counsel.

CM APPL.1730/2026 (Exemption

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

MAC.APP. 21/2026

1. This appeal assails order dated 23^rd January 2026 passed by Presiding Officer Presiding Officer, MACT, East, Karkardooma Courts,

Delhi, dismissing MACT No. 231/2023 of the claimants on the ground of limitation, basis the provision under Section 166 (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘MV Act’).

2. Mr. Prashar, Advocate appearing for appellants, states that in a batch of petitions, with lead petition being MAC APP. 270/2024 Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. ASI Vedpal & Ors. this issue has been agitated by various claimants, and is li