Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J
RAM SHARAN – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of dismissal proceedings and appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenges to the inquiry process, evidence, and prejudicial effects. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observations on the procedural justifications and evidence standards. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. findings justifying the dismissal as proportionate to misconduct. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. conclusion of the court's dismissal of the petition. (Para 20) |
ORDER
% 09.01.2026
1. This writ petition challenges charge-sheet dated 31st March, 2014, inquiry report dated 9th March, 2015 and order dated 15th May, 2015 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, imposing the penalty of dismissal from service on the Petitioner. The dismissal has been affirmed in appeal and again in review.
Factual Background
2. The background relevant to the present petition is as follows:
2.1. The Petitioner joined Respondent No. 1 Bank as a clerk on 23rd April, 1990. He was promoted to the post of Manager Scale-I on 12th June, 2006 and thereafter to Middle Management Grade Scale-II on 11th June, 2011.
2.2. He was posted at the Khera Bajhera Branch, District Meerut, with effect from 12th June, 2011. He served there until 7t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
