SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J
Anuj Jain – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
W.P.(C) 11974/2024|CM APPL. 972/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ashish Aggarwal, Gurkamal Hora, Tanya Aggarwal
For the Respondents: Arjun Mahajan, Apoorv Upmanyu, Harsh Vashisht

Individual property floor conversion from leasehold to freehold is permissible under government policy subject to the applicant's disclaimer of interests in concurrently misused property portions and the satisfaction of proportionate dues.

Headnote:The case involves a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus for the conversion of property leasehold rights into freehold rights. The core facts involve requests for conversion for various floor portions of a plot, subject to specific policies of the respondent authority. The court noted that the conversion request was governed by the conversion policy dated 20.08.2014, specifically paragraph 'd', which mandates payment of outstanding dues as a condition for conversion. The primary issue was whether the petitioners could be granted conversion of their respective floors despite misuser charges being attached to the basement portion of the property. The court reasoned that in accordance with the respondent's policy, individual floor conversion is permissible provided the applicants disclaim interest in the misused portion and consent to necessary regulatory actions like sealing and auctioning by the respondent for the recovery of dues. The writ petition is disposed of with directions for the petitioners to file affidavits disclaiming interest in the basement, followed by the respondent's obligation to effect the conversion into freehold within the specified timeframe.

Table of Content
1. applicability of conversion policies for individual property floors. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conditionality of conversion based on disclaimers regarding misused property portions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)

1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to convert lease hold rights into free hold rights in respect of the properties being 2nd Floor, back portion, Plot No. 11, Block-BA (West), Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088, 2nd Floor, front portion, Plot No.11, Block-BA (West), Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088, 1st Floor, Front portion, Plot no. 11, Block-BA (West), Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088 and 1st Floor, back portion, Plot no. 11, Block-BA (West), Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088 (inadvertently missed out in the prayer clause).

2. Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioners draws my attention to the conversion policy of the respondent dated 20.08.2014 and more particularly paragraph d which reads as under:-

“d) Conversion of individual flats/floors/shops in such complexes will be subject to the owner paying the proportionate amount of total outstanding dues like ground rent, misuse charges etc. in respect of the property as a whole plus the dues that are attributable to the particular flat/ shop being considered for conversion - In respect of aforesaid clause, it is clarified that the proportionate amount of common dues like ground rent etc. will continue but any penalty charges like misuse, damages etc. It should be payable only by the owner/occupier of floor who was misusing the property. In the property has been rebuilt and the penalty charges are leviable prior to a time when the present structure came up then proportionate charges may be recovered from all the owners.

For floor wise conversion, a certificate from re-gistered architect regarding area of plot, plinth area of plot, total number of flats, total number of floors, conversion area, plinth area of flat, proportionate common area, etc. can be taken for calculation of conversion charges.”

3. The prayer of the petitioners is squarely covered by the paragraph ‘d’ of the conversion policy.

4. Mr. Mahajan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent states that the basement floor of the said property has been misused contrary to the bye laws and hence, there are misuser charges qua the said portion.

5. He states that the respondent will convert the above said portions, provided all the owners give affidavit indicating that they are not concerned in any manner with the ownership of the basement portion of the said property and have no objection to the respondent sealing the basement portion of the property and auctioning it to recover its misuser charges.

6. Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel will provide the said affidavit.

7. Subject to the petitioners filing the said affidavit within 4 weeks from today and filing new application for conversion, the respondent shall convert the 4 portions of the property indicated above from leasehold to freehold expeditiously and in any case not later than 8 weeks from filing the new application.

8. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top