Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Bansal, J
Jeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Mcd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court intervention against unauthorized construction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. effect of parallel litigation and tribunal appeals. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. binding nature of prior directions and regularization processes. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
09.01.2026
W.P.(C) 14727/2025 and W.P.(C) 16185/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent nos.1 to 5, to take action against the unauthorized construction in House No. E 58, Village Hiranki, Main Chowk, Delhi-110036, being carried out by the respondent no. 6.
2. Status report has been handed over on behalf of the respondent/MCD in Court and the same is taken on record.
3. As per the status report, the subject property has been booked on 17th October, 2025 and demolition order has been passed on 11th November, 2025.
4. Counsel appearing on behalf of the private party/ respondent no.6 has handed over an order dated 6th December, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) 18574/2025, which was filed by the respondent no.6 herein.
5. The said writ petition was filed by the respondent no.6 against the demolition order dated 11th November, 2025 passed by the respondent/MCD in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
