Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J
Sylom Blind Centre – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of the registration cessation and audit correspondence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court directs administrative authority to decide upon pending representations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
CM APPL. 1223-1224/2026 (for exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 277/2026
1. The petitioner claims to be a charitable and non-profitable organization registered under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (“FCRA, 2010”). It appears that the inspection audit for the financial years 2015-16 and 2017-18 was conducted and pursuant to the audit observations, the petitioner’s registration certificate has been declared to be ceased.
2. The aforesaid position is noticeable in Annexure P-3, which states as under:-
“Registration Certificate is deemed to have ceased! (Association's FCRA certificate of registration has expired on 28/06/2024. No Association whose certificate of registration has ceased to exist shall either receive or utilise the foreign contribution until the certificate is renewed.)”
3. The record would indicate that, thereafter, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.0
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
