SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J
Bhag Chand – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
CRL.M.C. 133/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ruchika Gupta, Hemant Bhardwaj, Parvej Alam
For the Respondents: Digam Singh Dagar

The High Court may exercise inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings, including those involving non-compoundable offences like sexual offences, if the parties have reached an amicable settlement, the marriage is subsisting, and the court finds that continuing the trial would serve no useful purpose.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking the quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The petition was based on a settlement arrived at between the parties following the marriage of the petitioner and the prosecutrix, with whom he has two children. The court found that the parties had settled their disputes amicably and that the prosecutrix and her mother had no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The main issue was whether the court should exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings in an offence involving serious charges like rape and POCSO violations when the parties have reached a compromise and are living harmoniously. The reasoning of the court was that since the parties have reconciled and are living together with their children, continuing the criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would only breed further acrimony, thus violating the interests of justice. The court ordered that the FIR, along with all consequential proceedings, be quashed.

Table of Content
1. procedural disposal of exemption applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background involving marriage and compromise between parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. judicial discretion to quash proceedings where parties have reached an amicable settlement. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
CRL.M.A. 490/2026 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 133/2026

3. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR bearing No. 258/2019, registered at Police Station Budh Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 363/366/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC') and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter ‘POCSO Act’) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement arrive at between the parties.

4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

5. All the petitioners and respondent nos. 2 & 3 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Budh Vihar, Delhi.

6. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No. 3 left her house for school at about 06:30 AM on 01.10.2019 and thereafter went missing. Thereafter, missing complaint was filed by respondent no. 2. During the course of investigation, it was revealed that on 05.04.2020, the prosecutrix/respondent No. 3 returned to Makrega Gaon, Kanpur along with the petitioner and established physical relations with him. At the relevant time, both the prosecutrix and the petitioner were approximately 16 years of age. On 02.11.2020, a chargesheet was filed against the petitioner under Sections 363/366/376 IPC read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act. During the pendency of trial, it transpired that the prosecutrix/respondent No. 3 solemnized marriage with the petitioner on 09.04.2021. Out of the said wedlock, two children have been born.

7. During the trial proceedings, respondent no. 2 (mother of the prosecutrix) came to know that the prosecutrix had married the petitioner of her own free will and consent and was residing happily with him. Consequently, the parties have amicably settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 01.12.2025 and are living together peacefully.

8. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 & 3 who have been identified by the IO, have categorically stated that they have entered into compromise out of their own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, they have no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

9. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

10. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 258/2019, registered at Police Station Budh Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 363/366/376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition stands disposed of.

12. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top