SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 849

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NIRMAL KUMAR VS. DINESH KUMAR & ORS.


$~5

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. 1053/2025

M/S MEDUSA FASHION .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Ishan Gaur, Mr. Nikhil

Kohli, Mr. Kushank Garg and Ms. Saumya Tiwari, Advocates.

versus

M/S AMBIENCE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

.....Respondent

Through: Mr. P. K. Agrawal, Mr.

Rishabh Tomar, Mr. Akshay Chitkara & Ms. Sanjoli Gupta,

Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN

SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 09.01.2026

1. The present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [―Act‖] has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties in accordance with Clause 8 of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 15.07.2022 [―MoU‖] as entered between the parties. Clause 8 of the

MoU reads as follows:

8. Arbitration and Jurisdiction:

Any difference or dispute arising between the Parties arising out of or in relation to this MOU shall be referred to the sole Arbitrator appointed by the First Party. The arbitration shall be conducted under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties. The venue of the arbitration shall be at New Delhi. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top