SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CINEPOLIS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS. ADDITIONAL/JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- TRANSFER PRICING 1(3) DELHI & ORS.


$~30 to 32 and 34

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 223/2026 + W.P.(C) 225/2026

KIRIN TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr.

Ariit Ghosh and Ms. Kanika Jain,

Advs. versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 30 DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC, Mr.

Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Parth Samwal, JSCs and Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Mr. Nischay

Purohit, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

O R D E R

% 08.01.2026

CM APPL-1012/2026 in W.P.(C) 219/2026 (exemption) CM APPL-1015/2026 in W.P.(C) 220/2026 (exemption) CM APPL-1079/2026 in W.P.(C) 223/2026 (exemption) CM APPL-1083/2026 in W.P.(C) 225/2026 (exemption)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an identical bunch of matters is already pending and that the annexures qua which the office has

pointed out an objection about them being illegible, will not be required. He thus prayed that the objections be overruled.

2. In view of the submissions, the office objection in each case is overruled.

W.P.(C) 219/2026, CM APPL-1011/2026 (stay) W

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top