Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vivek Chaudhary, Renu Bhatnagar, JJ
Manju Varma – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Verma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context of appeal regarding refusal to condone delay in filing written statement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. mandatory nature of delhi high court (original side) rules 2018 regarding strict limitation periods. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
1. The present appeal has been filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 challenging the Order dated 16.10.2024 (hereinafter referred to as “impugned order”) passed by the learned Single Judge in interim application being I.A No. 41937 of 2024 in CS(OS) No. 72 of 2024 titled as Naresh Verma v. Manoj Kumar Jain & Ors.
2. The Civil Suit was originally instituted by the Plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 seeking declaration/cancellation of the Sale Deed dated 28.01.2021 executed by the Appellants herein in favour of Defendant no. 1 (Respondent No. 2 herein) as well as consequent decree of declaration, pre-emption and declaration directing Defendant No. 1 to transfer Second Floor of property bearing No. 91, Jain Cooperative House Building Society Limited, known as
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
