Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anil Kshetarpal, Amit Mahajan, JJ
Deepak Panwar – Appellant
Versus
Government of Nct Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background involving technical errors in omr sheet filling. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. adherence to examination instructions is mandatory for candidate evaluation. (Para 10) |
| 3. dismissal of the petition due to settled legal position on omr errors. (Para 11 , 12) |
O R D E R
1. Through the present Petition, the Petitioner assails the correctness of the order dated 01.07.2025 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’], whereby the O.A. 2333/2017 filed by the Petitioner was dismissed.
2. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts in brief are required to be noticed.
3. The Petitioner, pursuant to the Recruitment Notice dated 12.09.2013 issued by the Respondent No.2, had applied for the post of DASS Grade-II (Post Code 40/13). Thereafter, in June 2017, he had appeared for the Tier-1 examination for the said post. During the examination, an Optical Mark Recognition sheet [hereinafter referred to as ‘OMR sheet’] was provided to the Petitioner, wherein he was required to correctly indicate his Roll Number both in writin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
