SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RETAIL ROYALTY COMPANY AND ANR VS. RUPESH VISHVAMBAR PAITHANE TRADING AS CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES


$~11

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 246/2024 & I.As. 6537/2024, 6538/2024

MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....Plaintiff

Through: Ms. Saumya Bajpai, Advocate.

versus

PASSIFLORA PHARMACEUTICALS .....Defendant

Through: Mr. Akshay Ravi, Advocate.

Defendant in person through VC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 08.01.2026

1. Present suit was instituted by the Plaintiff against the Defendant inter alia for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from infringing trade mark ‘FLORA’, which Plaintiff adopted in 1995 in respect of medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations and for which registration was obtained on 01.05.2007 in Class 5 under registration no. 1554350. Plaintiff has been selling its goods under the said trade mark since 1995. Defendant filed an application for registration of trade mark ‘PASSIFLORA PHARMACEUTICALS’ on 14.06.2022 and Plaintiff filed notice of opposition before the Registrar of Trade Marks on 11.01.2023. Subsequent thereto, Plaintiff filed the present suit for injunction, rendition of accounts

and damages.

2. During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top