SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 887

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KUNAL BAJAJ VS. POOJA SHARMA BAJAJ


$~68

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 11/2026

SHANSHA @ SHADAB .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State.

SI Jitender Kumar, PS Nangloi.

Father of the Prosecutrix in person.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 08.01.2026

CRL.A. 11/2026

The captioned appeal is directed against a judgment of the Sessions

Court dated 10.11.2025, and order of sentence dated 09.12.2025, by which the appellant was convicted of offences under Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [“POCSO Act”], and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]. The appeal has

been admitted by order dated 06.01.2026.

At the request of the father of the prosecutrix, who is personally

present, the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee is requested to

provide him with legal aid counsel.

List the appeal in the Regular list, in its own turn.

CRL.M.(BAIL) 12/2026 (for suspension of sentence

1. This is an application for suspension of sentence imposed upon the appellant in connection with his conviction in SC No. 207/2018, arising

out of FIR No. 43/2018, registered under Sections 354D/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top