Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J
X – Appellant
Versus
Indian Institute Of Technology Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to exhaust proper institutional channels before seeking external judicial or quasi-judicial intervention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural mandate for the disciplinary authority to process internal complaints committee reports prior to appeal accrual. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
O R D E R
08.01.2026
1. During the course of hearing, it transpires that against the report of the Internal Complaint Committee(ICC) under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter the ‘POSH Act’) dated 04.10.2023, modified on 25.01.2024, the petitioner had inadvertently approached the Industrial Tribunal under the POSH Act. The said appeal was withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies in accordance with law.
2. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed the instant petition for the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to disposed of the appeal dated 13.11.2024, filed by the Petitioner preferably within two weeks.
(ii) Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.”
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
