IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J
Dwarka Dass Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Mehroonisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing employment and incident veracity in compensation claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. limited appellate scope under the employee's compensation act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 30 of the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, thereby impugning the order dated 20.03.2024 passed by the learned Commissioner Employee’s Compensation, District West, in WC No. EC/D/WD/83/2019/649. Vide the aforesaid decision, the claim application of the respondents herein was allowed, and the appellant herein was directed to deposit the compensation amount within a period of 30 days.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant, while assailing the impugned order, contends that the claimant failed to establish an employer-employee relationship as the claimant did not examine any co-workers in support of this plea. Further, there is stated to be a discrepancy with respect to the place of the incident as, though the appellant is the owner of the premises at NW-188, Vishnu Garden, Khyala, Delhi, the incident is stated to have taken place at NW-186, Vishnu Garden, Khyala, Delhi.
3. The above contentions are opposed by the learn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.