SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 991

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J
Suresh Kumar Garg – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
CRL.M.C. 3550/2023 | TR.P.(CRL.) 115/2023 | TR.P.(CRL.) 116/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ripudaman Bhardwaj, Kushagra Kumar, Amit Kumar Rana, Suresh Kumar Garg, Zoheb Hossain, Vivek Gurnani, Kartik Sabharwal
For the Respondents: Piyush Sharma, Vikram Saini, Jainish Dubey

The court possesses the inherent jurisdiction to consolidate and transfer inter-district criminal proceedings to ensure judicial efficiency and procedural convenience when multiple related cases are pending across different jurisdictions, provided the interests of justice and the parties are addressed.

Headnote:The proceedings concerned the transfer of criminal cases between district courts, specifically involving the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The Trial Court had ordered the transfer of corruption cases from the Rouse Avenue District Courts to the Rohini Courts to align with pending money laundering proceedings. Upon review, the Court determined that consolidating both sets of proceedings within the Rouse Avenue jurisdiction would be more appropriate for efficient adjudication. The primary issue brought before the Court was the administrative and jurisdictional feasibility of transferring complex financial and corruption-related cases. The Court reasoned that since the prosecuting agencies consented to the consolidation of proceedings at a single venue, the interests of justice and judicial efficiency favored retaining the matters within the original district court. The petitions were disposed of with the direction that all cases be listed before the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to a single competent court.

Table of Content
1. overview of transfer petitions originating from lower district court proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. consolidation of related proceedings into one venue for efficient judicial throughput. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)

O R D E R

1. These three petitions concern transfer of proceedings arising out of Criminal Complaint No. 215/2019 and Supplementary Criminal Complaint No. 02/2022, which were pending before the Special Judge, CBI Court-13, Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi.

2. By order dated 28.03.2023, the Special Judge directed the transfer of the aforesaid cases to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court PMLA, North-West, Rohini Courts, New Delhi, where related proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [“PMLA”] were pending. One of the accused – Suresh Kumar Garg, has challenged the said order in CRL.M.C. 3550/2023. TR.P.(CRL.) 115/2023 and TR.P.(CRL.) 116/2023 were registered on a communication received from the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Rouse Avenue District Courts, pursuant to the said order, as the cases are required to be transferred inter-district.

3. Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, learned Special Public Prosecutor, appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, and Mr. Vivek Gurnani, learned Panel Counsel for the Enforcement Directorate, submit that in the peculiar facts of this case, they are instructed that the proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [“PC Act”], may continue before the Rouse Avenue District Courts, and that the proceedings under the PMLA may also be transferred from the Rohini Courts to the Rouse Avenue District Courts.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, instead of transferring Criminal Complaint No. 215/2019 and Supplementary Criminal Complaint No. 02/2022 from the Special Court, Rouse Avenue District Courts, to the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, it is directed that the proceedings under PMLA [Prosecution Complaint No. 01/2015 under Section 45 of the PMLA] pending before the Rohini Courts be transferred to the Rouse Avenue District Courts.

5. The petitions are disposed of with the direction that all three cases will be listed before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Rouse Avenue District Courts, on 21.01.2026, for assignment to a competent Court which can consider both the cases under the PC Act, as well as the case under the PMLA.

6. The petitions, alongwith pending application, are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top