Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J
Rajinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the maintainability and procedural validity of domestic violence complaints against in-laws. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's issuance of notice in challenged proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions.
Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 77/2026 & CRL.M.A. 253/2026 (stay)
By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing/setting aside of the orders dated 18.03.2025 and 30.04.2025 by the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Mahila Court 05), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in MC Case No.63/2025.
2. Mr. Sonal Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is the mother-in-law and petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the sisters-in-law of respondent No.2 who have been summonsed vide orders dated 18.03.2025 and 30.04.2025 in proceedings filed by respondent No.2 under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (‘DV Act’).
3. Mr. Anand points-out, tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
