Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
Rajesh Sultania – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Murarka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts and grievances regarding witness list filing and court proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's reasoning on condoning procedural delays in the interest of deciding cases on merit. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. directions for expediting trials and final disposal of the petition. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 01.12.2025 passed by the learned DJ, Commercial Court-05, District Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS (COMM) No. 3017/2021 and further seeking directions to take on record the petitioner’s list of witnesses.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws attention of this Court to the impugned order dated 01.12.2025 to submit that the impugned order proceeds on the basis that since the list of witnesses was not filed within 15 days of framing of issues and that no sufficient cause has been shown, consequently the list of witnesses filed by the petitioner/defendant was not taken on record.
3. He also submits that on the same date i.e. 01.12.2025, the examination-in-chief of the petitioner/defe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
