Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, CJ, Tejas Karia, J
First Generation Lawyers Association – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of prayers in public interest litigation regarding panel lists. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. treating pil as a representation for governmental administrative review. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. inclusion of interveners in administrative representation processes. (Para 6 , 16) |
| 4. regulation of social media conduct and judicial decorum for litigants. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. This public interest litigation has been filed with the following prayers:-
“a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the Respondent Union of India to forthwith place before this Hon’ble Court the complete record of the empanelment process, including the criteria adopted, marking sheets, evaluation mechanism, objections (if any), and the material considered for preparing the impugned panel list dated 21.11.2025;
b) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing the impugned panel/empanelment list dated 21.11.2025 to the extent it includes persons who are ineligible and who do not fulfil the notified, statutory, or policy-based eligibility criteria;
c) Issue a writ of Mandamu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
