SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1076

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J
Nokia Technologies OY – Appellant
Versus
Hisense Group Holdings Co. Ltd. – Respondent
CS(COMM) 645/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abhilasha Nautiyal, Asavari Jain, Shuvam Bhattacharya, Vignesh Raj T.
For the Respondents: Sai Krishna Rajagopal, Julien George, Anu Paarcha, Avijit Kumar, N. Parvati, Christo Sabu

A court may allow the withdrawal of a commercial suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit upon settlement of disputes via a global patent license agreement, while also granting a refund of court fees under statutory provisions.

Headnote:The present proceedings involve an application under O. XXIII R. 1 and S. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking withdrawal of a suit for patent infringement in light of a global settlement reached between the parties. The court considered the parties' joint submission regarding the execution of a Patent License Agreement. The core issue is whether the plaintiff may withdraw the pending infringement suit with liberty to file a fresh suit in the event of the subsequent termination or expiry of the settlement agreement, alongside a request for the refund of court fees. The court determined that as the dispute was amicably settled at an early stage, such withdrawal is permissible and justified under the relevant provisions. The application is allowed, the suit stands withdrawn with the requested liberty, and the plaintiff is held entitled to a 50% refund of court fees under S. 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

Table of Content
1. application for withdrawal of suit based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legal standard for allowing withdrawal of civil suit with liberty. (Para 4 , 5)
3. final orders regarding suit disposal and court fee refund. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

O R D E R

I.A. 91/2026

1. This application is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC for withdrawal of the suit as also for a direction to release the confidential/sealed cover documents filed by both the parties to their respective counsels. Direction for refund of court fees is also sought.

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr. Sai Krishna Rajagopal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Defendants and submits on instructions that Defendants have no objection to this application being allowed in terms of the averments made in the application.

4. Present suit was filed by the Plaintiff inter alia restraining infringement of the suit patents and damages. As stated in the application, parties have entered into a global Patent License Agreement to settle the pending disputes and in consonance with the settlement, Plaintiff seeks to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit for the same subject matter against the Defendants in accordance with law, in the event of termination or expiry of the Patent License Agreement, excluding the period of subsistence of the said Agreement, including the past release in Section 2.1 of the Patent License Agreement. Refund of court fees is sought on the ground that suit has been amicably settled at an early stage.

5. Court has perused the contents of the application and finds no impediment in allowing the same. Accordingly, the application is allowed, permitting the Plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty as prayed for in paragraph 3 of the application and limited thereto. Direction is issued for release of the confidential/sealed cover documents filed by the respective parties to their counsels on record, for which purpose matter will be listed before the concerned Joint Registrar on 29.01.2026, on which date parties shall furnish a list of the documents sought to be released.

6. Application stands disposed of.

CS(COMM) 645/2025 & I.As. 15149/2025, 29482/2025

7. Suit is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for, in accordance with law and restricted to averments in paragraph 3 of the aforementioned application.

8. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of 50% of the court fee in accordance with Section 16A of Court Fees Act, 1870.

9. Date of 19.02.2026 stands cancelled.

10. Pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top