Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J
Akesh Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Geeta Mittal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural initiation regarding the rent control petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments concerning bona fide requirement and available accommodation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. assessment of triable issues based on admitted facts. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. grant of stay on the eviction order pending review. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
05.01.2026
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeks the following prayers: -
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of case bearing E.P. no. RC ARC 6/2023, entitled Geeta Mittal & anr. versus Sh. Akesh Kumar Jain, & anr., and to set aside the impugned order dated 10.06.2025 passed by the court of Shri Rahul Venna, CCJ-cum-ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi dismissing the application of the petitioners for leave to defend and contest the eviction petition and to allow the application of the petitioners for leave to defend and grant to the petitioners leave to defend and contest the eviction petition on its merits.
The Hon'ble Court may be further pleased to pass such oth
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
