Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankaran, J
Kalpataru Projects International Limited – Appellant
Versus
Northern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background leading to the petition for extension of the arbitral mandate. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. statutory framework and criteria for granting an extension of arbitral mandate. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. judicial determination regarding the appropriate extension period based on current trial progress. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R
05.01.2026
1. The present Petition is filed under Section 29-A (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”] seeking extension of time for making and publishing the arbitral award in arbitral proceedings arising out of a Construction Contract Agreement dated 17.09.2021[“Agreement”], executed between the Petitioner, Kalpataru Projects International Limited, and the Respondent, Northern Railway.
2. Owing to the disputes between the parties, the Petitioner invoked the Arbitration by issuing Notice Invoking Arbitration dated 02.05.2023.
3. Petitioner had filed a Petition under Section 11 of the Act before this Hon’ble Court being the Arbitration Petition No. 766 of 2023. This Court vide Order 20.12.2023 had appointed Hon’ble Mr. Justice (Retd.) Vineet Saran as the nominee arbitrator for the P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
