Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Madhu Jain, J
Headstar Construction Co – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to the challenge of a debarment order. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. the court's refusal to grant interim relief that equates to the final outcome of the petition. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
O R D E R
CM APPL. 9/2026 (Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4/2026
3. The present petition has been filed assailing the communication dated 25.11.2025, issued by the respondents, to the extent that it debars the petitioner for a period of six months from contractors enlistment maintained by the respondent, thereby restraining the petitioner from participating in the tenders of CPWD/PWD and other Government Organizations.
4. Briefly stating the factual background, respondent no.1 invited tenders for renovation/upgradation of 90 NGO rooms at IBCTS, 35 S.P. Marg, New Delhi vide Notice Inviting Tender Bearing No. 38/EE/QDIVN/2024-25. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner participated in the tender process and was issued a letter of award for the above said tender on 16.12.2024.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently, vide communication dated 30.01.2025, the petitione
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
