SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Madhu Jain, J
Headstar Construction Co – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
W.P.(C) 4/2026 | CM APPL. 10/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Nikhil Saini
For the Respondents: None

Granting interim relief that effectively awards the final relief prayed for in a writ petition is impermissible at the pre-adjudication stage.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of debarment for six months resulting from a failure to execute awarded tender work due to family medical emergencies. Although the respondent acknowledged the petitioner's circumstances and forfeited the performance guarantee, they proceeded to debar the petitioner, which prevented further participation in government tenders. The court’s primary determination at this stage was to initiate notice while addressing the petitioner's urgent prayer for interim relief. The main issue is whether the petitioner is entitled to an interim stay of the debarment order to participate in imminent tender processes before the matter is decided on merits. The court reasoned that granting interim relief would effectively amount to granting the final relief sought in the writ petition, which is impermissible at the interim stage without full adjudication. The matter remains pending for adjudication; notice issued to respondents returnable on 19th January, 2026.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts leading to the challenge of a debarment order. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. the court's refusal to grant interim relief that equates to the final outcome of the petition. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

O R D E R

CM APPL. 9/2026 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4/2026

3. The present petition has been filed assailing the communication dated 25.11.2025, issued by the respondents, to the extent that it debars the petitioner for a period of six months from contractors enlistment maintained by the respondent, thereby restraining the petitioner from participating in the tenders of CPWD/PWD and other Government Organizations.

4. Briefly stating the factual background, respondent no.1 invited tenders for renovation/upgradation of 90 NGO rooms at IBCTS, 35 S.P. Marg, New Delhi vide Notice Inviting Tender Bearing No. 38/EE/QDIVN/2024-25. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner participated in the tender process and was issued a letter of award for the above said tender on 16.12.2024.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently, vide communication dated 30.01.2025, the petitioner informed respondent no.1 of his inability to execute the awarded work owing to the hospitalization of the petitioners father, who had suffered a cardiac ailment and was advised continuous medical supervision and treatment. The said explanation was duly acknowledged by the respondent, and the performance guarantee furnished by the petitioner was subsequently forfeited vide letter dated 13.02.2025.

6. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits, that in addition to performance guarantee, contractual penalty was also forfeited by the respondent. Thereafter, a show cause notice dated 25.09.2025 proposing disciplinary action against the petitioner. The petitioner submitted a detailed reply thereto vide letter dated 04.10.2025.

7. Subsequently, the respondents proceeded to pass the impugned communication dated 25.11.2025, debarring the petitioner from the contractors enlistment for a period of six months, which, according to the petitioner, has the effect of preventing him from participating in tenders of CPWD/PWD and other Government organisations.

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner participated in a tender process on 20.12.2025, and upon rejection of his bid on 24.12.2025, the petitioner became aware of the impugned debarment order dated 25.11.2025. He submits that the petitioner is otherwise eligible and seeks permission to participate in ongoing and forthcoming tenders, including a tender proposed to be floated on 03.01.2026, pending adjudication of the present petition.

9. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and considered the submissions made.

10. Issue notice.

11. At this stage, to allow the petitioner to participate in the tender process which is proposed to be floated on 03.01.2026 would, in effect, amount to allowing the relief prayed in the writ petition and deciding the matter on merits, which is impermissible at the interim stage.

12. In these circumstances, let notice be issued to the respondents through all permissible modes, returnable on 19th January, 2026, before the Roster Bench.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top