SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46513

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RENEW DINKAR URJA PVT LTD & ANR. VS. CENTRAL TRANSMISSION UTILITY OF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.


$~13

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 19838/2025, CM APPL.82795/2025 and 82796/2025

RASHMI @POOJA BAHRY .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Osama Suhail, Ms. Sumana

Suhail, Ms. Sanya Gandotra and Ms.

Puja Kesarwani, Advocates.

versus

NEENA BAHRY & ORS. .....Respondents

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

O R D E R

% 31.12.2025

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing an order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the District Magistrate (West), GNCTD in Eviction Case No. 692/DCW/2022 and the consequential orders passed by the Appellate Authority (Divisional Commissioner, Department of revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi) in the proceedings under Rule 22(3)(4) of Delhi

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009.

2. It is submitted that on account of the impugned orders, the petitioner is facing imminent threat of dispossession from her residential abode. It is further submitted that the impugned orders do not examine the controversy in keeping with the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in S. Vanitha vs The Deputy Commissioner (2021) 15 SCC 730, wherein it has been held that the rights conferred under the Maintenance and Welfare of Paren

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top