IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RENEW DINKAR URJA PVT LTD & ANR. VS. CENTRAL TRANSMISSION UTILITY OF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 19838/2025, CM APPL.82795/2025 and 82796/2025
RASHMI @POOJA BAHRY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Osama Suhail, Ms. Sumana
Suhail, Ms. Sanya Gandotra and Ms.
Puja Kesarwani, Advocates.
versus
NEENA BAHRY & ORS. .....Respondents
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R
% 31.12.2025
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing an order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the District Magistrate (West), GNCTD in Eviction Case No. 692/DCW/2022 and the consequential orders passed by the Appellate Authority (Divisional Commissioner, Department of revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi) in the proceedings under Rule 22(3)(4) of Delhi
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009.
2. It is submitted that on account of the impugned orders, the petitioner is facing imminent threat of dispossession from her residential abode. It is further submitted that the impugned orders do not examine the controversy in keeping with the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in S. Vanitha vs The Deputy Commissioner (2021) 15 SCC 730, wherein it has been held that the rights conferred under the Maintenance and Welfare of Paren
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.