SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NILESH VISHNU JAGTAP VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
W.P.(C) 19826/2025



##PAGE1##

$~13

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P. (C) 19826/2025, CM APPL. 82768/2025, CM APPL.

82769/2025 and CM APPL. 82770/2025

RCR STEEL WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar, AOR along

with Mr. Sudhanshu Pathak,

Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Rai, Mr.

Lakshay Singh and Ms. Pragya

Prachi Pandey, Advocates.

versus

NOMINATED AUTHORITY, MINISTRY OF COAL, GOVT.

OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Ms.

Priyanka S. Aneja and Mr.

Yash, Advocates for R-1 &

R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN

SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 29.12.2025

1. The present Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, challenges the Appropriation Order, bearing

F.No. NA-104/24/2023-NA, dated 23.12.2025, issued by the

Respondent No. 1 herein. By way of the said Appropriation Order, a

sum of ₹1,25,25,322.30/- has been appropriated by invocation of Bank

Guarantee No. 0962023BG0000127 dated 02.05.2023, pursuant to a

Show Cause Notice dated 31.07.2024, alleging non-compliance of the

‘efficiency parameters’ stipulated under the Coal Mine Production &

Development Agreement dated 29.03.2023 in respect of the Patal East

(Eastern Part) Coal Block.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 17:52:27

##PAGE2##

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has made submissions for

over an hour.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has made a valiant and

commendable effort to put across his case; however, upon this Court

expressing its disinclination to grant any relief, learned counsel for the

Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to

avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

4. Liberty, as sought for, is granted.

5. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending

application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J

(VACATION JUDGE)

DECEMBER 29, 2025/tk/her

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 17:52:27

##PAGE3##

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 17:52:27

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top