IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAHARAJA AGRASAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & ANR. VS. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR.
W.P.(C) 19735/2025
##PAGE1##
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 19735/2025
VIKRAM SINGH KANYA MAHAVIDYALAYA
& ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti
Kumari and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advocates.
versus
PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh and Mr.
Yatharth Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 24.12.2025
1. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioners under Article
226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-.
“a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ or order quashing
& setting aside the impugned decision letter dated 30.09.2025 issued by
PCI rejecting the petitioner’s application for extension of approval of
D.Pharm course;
b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction
to respondent to process the petitioner’s application and pass final order
for grant of extension of approval of D.Pharm course to be petitioner
institution for academic session 2026-27;”
2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned decision dated 30.09.2025
taken by PCI, rejecting the application for extension of approval of D.
Pharm course. It is urged that no reason has been given for rejecting the
application for approval in the impugned communication. Petitioners applied
to PCI for approval of D. Pharm course and by its decision dated
W.P.(C) 19735/2025 Page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 19:23:19
##PAGE2##10.12.2023, PCI granted recognition for academic session 2023-24.
Petitioners applied for extension of approval for academic session 2024-25
but the application was rejected vide decision dated 10.12.2024. Petitioners
submitted the SIF in December, 2024 for extension of approval for academic
session 2025-26 and after a prolonged delay, PCI carried out inspection on
26.06.2025 and submitted its report, basis which PCI communicated
deficiencies vide letter dated 20.08.2025 albeit the same were beyond the
inspection report. Compliance report was submitted by the Petitioner vide
letter dated 23.08.2025 with all supporting documents.
3. It is further stated that on 19.09.2025, PCI rejected Petitioners’
application without even considering the points raised in their reply dated
23.08.2025 and overlooking that deficiencies were cured. This decision was
challenged by the Petitioners by filing an appeal on 29.09.2025, however,
application for extension of approval was rejected on 30.09.2025.
4. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that
no reason has been given in the impugned decision dated 30.09.2025 for
rejecting the application for extension of approval for D. Pharm course for
academic session 2025-26 and the order only records that with respect to
submitted compliance and inspection report, it is decided to reject the
application. After the deficiencies were pointed out by PCI in letter dated
20.08.2025 albeit beyond the Inspectors’ report, Petitioner had submitted
compliance vide letter dated 23.08.2025 with supporting documents.
Thereafter there was no communication from PCI pointing out any further
deficiencies and therefore, it is not known why the application was rejected.
After the deficiencies were rectified, if PCI was of the view that there were
further shortcomings, it ought to have put the Petitioners to notice to remove
W.P.(C) 19735/2025 Page 2 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 19:23:19
##PAGE3##the same. Impugned order violates principles of natural justice as no hearing
was granted to the Petitioners to explain that no deficiencies existed.
5. Issue notice.
6. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for PCI accepts notice and
submits that the applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.