IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHARAD PAL & ORS. VS. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C. 9340/2025
##PAGE1##
$~39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 9340/2025, CRL.M.A. 38989/2025 & CRL.M.A.
38990/2025
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, SPP for
State with Ms. Samridhi Dobhal, Mr. Hritwik
Maurya, Mr. Mayank Kaushik and Ms. Lisa
Pegwal, Advs.
versus
TUSHAR GOYAL .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R
% 24.12.2025
CRL.M.A. 38990/2025 (Exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 9340/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38989/2025
3. Through the present petition, the petitioner seeks the following
reliefs:-
“a) Set aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2025 passed by the Ld.
Special Judge, (NDPS)-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in
CNR No. DLCT010110002025, SC No.495/2025 titled as “State Vs.
Tushar Goyal & Ors.” arising out of the FIR No. 455/2024, dated
02.10.2024, u/s 20/21/22/25/27(A)/29 NDPS Act, & section 238(B)/209
BNS, PS Special Cell, New Delhi;
b) Cancel the interim bail granted to Tushar Goyal (Respondent herein)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 20:39:09
##PAGE2##and direct him to surrender before the concerned jail authorities; and
c) Pass such Order (s) as this Hon'ble Court deem fit in the interest of
justice.”
4. It has been informed by the learned SPP that the application before
the learned ASJ was filed by the respondent on 16.12.2025 for grant of
interim bail for the surgery of his mother and notice was issued for
18.12.2025. However, nobody could appear on behalf of the petitioner as no
notice was received by him. Thereafter, fresh notice was issued for
22.12.2025 but again, no notice was served upon the petitioner due to which
the petitioner was unaware about any such application being listed.
5. It is further submitted that on 22.12.2025, learned SPP appeared
before the learned ASJ for arguments in bail applications of the co-accused
persons related to the same FIR, on which date learned SPP submits that he
was taken by surprise as he was completely unaware that some application
for interim bail has been filed by the respondent and is listed, without any
notice served upon him. On the said date, the respondent was granted
interim bail for a period of one day despite the fact that the learned SPP had
sought time to respond to that application and to verify the medical
documents. The learned SPP had requested for some time from the learned
ASJ to verify the factum of the surgery of respondent’s mother, on the basis
of which the interim bail was sought. The Court thereafter adjourned the
matter for 23.12.2025.
6. It is submitted that on 23.12.2025, the factum of the verification could
not be verified as the hospital had informed the investigation agency that it
will take 2-4 days to submit their report. On this basis, the learned ASJ had
granted interim bail to the respondent till 03.01.2026, in the absence of any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 20:39:09
##PAGE3##verification report.
7. It is also submitted by learned SPP that the day when the impugned
order was passed, there was nothing on record to suggest that the petitioner’s
mother has been admitted in the hospital and no schedule was on learned
ASJ’s record to reflect that she has to undergo a surgery. It is submitted that
the learned ASJ was also not aware of the specific nature of the ailment and
surgery for which interim bail was being sought as the same do not find any
mention in the impugned order, instead the impugned order records ‘some
surgery’ and ‘some ailments’.
8. It is further submitted that on the previous occasions as well, the
respondent had sought for interim bail on one or the other grounds,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.