SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46733

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DELHIVERY LIMITED VS. BEYOUNG FOLKS PRIVATE LIMITED


$~11

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. 1990/2025

PREM DAAN SANSTHAN ....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Karan Chopra, Mr. Neeraj Malik,

Advs. versus

CELEXA WELLNESS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 23.12.2025

1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication

of disputes between the parties.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner executed a Lease Deed on 14.11.2019 commencing from 21.10.2019 for a period of 9 years with a 3 year lock-in period in favour of respondent. However the respondent

defaulted on the payment of rent and maintenance.

3. The Lease Deed contains an arbitration clause being Clause No. 34

which reads as under:

“34. Any dispute or difference arising between the parties shall be resolved amicably at the first instance. Unresolved disputes, controversies, contests, disputes If any, shall be in accordance with the Provisions of the Arbitration and Concd1ation, 1996 along with the rules framed there under and any amendments thereto by a sole Arbitrator appointed by the LESSOR and LESSEE. The arbitration s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top